TTRPG Stack
Dungeon Alchemist logo

Dungeon Alchemist

$39.99 one-time

VS
Dungeondraft logo

Dungeondraft

$19.99 one-time

Dungeon Alchemist vs Dungeondraft: Which Should You Use?

Last updated: 2026

Choose Dungeon Alchemist if…

GMs who want fast, good-looking battle maps without manually placing every piece of furniture.

Visit Dungeon Alchemist →

Choose Dungeondraft if…

GMs who regularly create custom battle maps and want assets that work directly in VTT lighting systems.

Visit Dungeondraft →

Side-by-side comparison

Dungeon Alchemist logo
Dungeon Alchemist
Dungeondraft logo
Dungeondraft
Pricing model one-time one-time
Starting price $39.99 $19.99
Free tier
Platforms Win, Mac Win, Mac, Linux
Game systems System agnostic System agnostic
Self-hosted
AI-powered
Open source
Works offline
Official content
Launched 2022 2019

Pricing breakdown

Dungeon Alchemist

One-time purchase around $39.99 (frequently on sale). No subscription.

Dungeondraft

Single one-time payment of $19.99 per licence. No subscription.

Pros & cons

Dungeon Alchemist

Pros

  • AI auto-population makes fully furnished maps in minutes
  • 3D renders work as handouts or stream overlays
  • One-time purchase with no subscription

Cons

  • Less precise control than Dungeondraft's manual approach
  • Export quality varies — may need post-processing for high-DPI VTT use
  • No Linux support

Dungeondraft

Pros

  • One-time purchase with no subscription
  • Universal VTT format exports lighting data alongside maps
  • Supports third-party asset packs for huge style variety

Cons

  • Desktop app only — no browser access
  • No world or overworld map mode (battle maps only)
  • Smaller asset library than Inkarnate out of the box

Frequently asked questions

Is Dungeon Alchemist or Dungeondraft cheaper?

Dungeondraft is cheaper at $19.99 vs Dungeon Alchemist's $39.99.

Can I use Dungeon Alchemist and Dungeondraft together?

Dungeon Alchemist and Dungeondraft overlap in the map-makers category, so most users pick one or the other rather than using both. That said, some GMs use them for different parts of their workflow if the tools serve genuinely different purposes.